|
||||||||||||||||||||
| The changing role of IANZ By Dr Llew Richards, Chief Executive, IANZ Expansionary mode In the past year, IANZ completed the first compliance
audits for the Ministry of Health’s National Screening Unit programme
involving BreastScreen Aotearoa and the National Cervical Screening Programme.
This work will be on-going and may possibly extend into other screening
programmes. It is taking longer than in the past to recruit the calibre of assessment staff we need to maintain the standard of service IANZ requires. Despite a comprehensive search, we are still without a Programme Manager in the Medical Testing programme: Graham Walker is acting in this position until a replacement for Phil Barnes, who left us at the end of last year, is found. Meanwhile, Sandra FitzPatrick has joined the Medical Testing accreditation team and Chris Astbury has been added to the Inspection Body accreditation team (see their profiles below). Further recruitments are planned for later on this year. Also expanding is our role in assisting the Ministry of Economic Development with the technical aspects of trade negotiations between New Zealand and the European Union, Singapore, China and other Asian initiatives. The Mutual Recognition Arrangements that IANZ has with accreditation bodies in these economies is providing a sound underpinning of the negotiations. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| New accreditations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| IMPORTANT REMINDER TO LABORATORIES Accredited laboratories (excluding medical testing laboratories) are reminded that their accreditation must be upgraded to the new NZS ISO/IEC 17025:2005 standard by 1 June 2007. All laboratories should now have been assessed. If you have completed the process of assessment and clearance against the new standard but have not received your new certificate, please contact your IANZ Programme Manager. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Following a review of the ISO 15189 standard, changes have been made to align it with the requirements of ISO 9001:2005. Standards New Zealand has advised that they are adopting the new standard and publishing it shortly as NZS/ISO 15189:2007. Medical testing laboratories accredited to NZS/ISO 15189:2003 are advised that it is expected they will need to upgrade to the new standard by 1 May 2009. We will shortly be advising those laboratories accredited to this standard about the changes that have been made and the expectations on laboratories to comply with the new requirements. A copy of the new standard will be provided at that time. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Commerce Minister Lianne Dalziel announced three
appointments to the Testing Laboratory Registration Council on 30 April
2007. Lianne Dalziel said she was pleased to appoint Dr Robin Pratt, Dr
Richard Janes, and Jo Brosnahan to the Council. Dr Robin Pratt succeeds the late Dr Geoff Page as council chair. Current council member Dr Richard Janes has been appointed as deputy chair, while Jo Brosnahan becomes a member of the council. All three have been appointed for three-year terms. Lianne Dalziel also acknowledged the commitment and contributions of Richard Dimmock who became temporary chair in August last year, and outgoing member Graeme Robertson who served on the council for the past six years. Mr Dimmock, who did not seek the position of chair, will continue to serve as a member of the council. The Council is composed of nine members, with five
appointed by the Minister of Commerce, and four appointed by the Council.
Current members include: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Richard Janes is a professional director on a range of export-focused boards and past Chief Executive of the NZ Game Industry Board and Cervena Company. He has a background in chemistry and textile engineering, and has 25 years of international experience in international marketing and branding. Among his directorship positions, he is the Chair of Asure New Zealand Ltd, a state-owned enterprise providing quality assurance and process enhancement services to the food industry. Jo Brosnahan has a background in economic geography and 15 years of knowledge and experience of working with local governments, and the transport and infrastructure sectors. She was Chief Executive of the Auckland Regional Council from 1996-2004, and the Northland Regional Council from 1991-1996. She is the Chair of Leadership New Zealand, and a member of, among others, the boards of Landcare Research NZ Limited, Housing New Zealand, and NZ Business Excellence Foundation. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dr Tony Barker has resigned from the Testing Laboratory
Registration Council and the Medical Testing Professional Advisory Committee,
effective 30 April 2007. Dr Barker is one of the longest serving members
of a PAC having served on the MTPAC since 1982. He took over the Chair
of this committee in 2005. In 2006 he was appointed as a member of the
Council. Dr Barker, a chemical pathologist, has worked extensively in
the public health system and brought this important perspective to the
PAC. |
||||||||||||||||||||
A periodic MRA (Mutual Recognition Arrangement) re-evaluation of IANZ by APLAC (Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) was undertaken in March. The five-person evaluation team spent five days obtaining evidence, including witnessing twelve on-site accreditation assessments of testing and calibration laboratories and inspection bodies. Issues raised were in regard to the accreditation process, and IANZ is addressing these. Confirmation of our continuing MRA signatory status with APLAC and EA (European cooperation for Accreditation) will be made at the APLAC MRA Council meeting in December. In its report, the evaluation team was impressed by the professionalism of IANZ staff and the high degree of value provided to clients. Team members were also impressed by the demanding qualifications required of new assessment staff before undertaking assessments on their own, and of the thoroughness of the information kits provided to assessment teams.
Back left: Steve
Medellin (A2LA, USA), Mike Ouellette (CLAS, NRC, Canada), Wong Wang Wah
(HKAS, Hong Kong) and Liao Chih-Heng (TAF, Chinese Taipei). |
||||||||||||||||||||
While the primary motivation for being accredited is that it is a necessity for doing business, the majority of clients are satisfied with IANZ’s service. In a survey of 100 clients in March by independent market research company TNS, 82% of respondents gave an overall satisfaction score of 7 or above (out of 9), which is considered to be well above average. TNS reported that clients feel IANZ is professional and assessors show objectivity and neutrality in their approach to clients and assessments. These are points that IANZ clients believe are important in an accreditation provider and are highly influential in terms of impact on the customer relationship. Also of a high standard are the manner in which we communicate, and the knowledge and information being conveyed. As in past surveys, respondents said the main reason for being accredited was that it is a requirement for business; this included legal requirements, their clients required it and/or it allowed them to be competitive. Accreditation also ensured improved operating systems and gave them credibility within the industry. Accreditation is seen as an endorsement for the quality of their service. The results of the survey were compared to other public authorities and industrial service providers worldwide, and showed the strength of relationship that IANZ has with its clients is well above average. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Patience and understanding needed During assessments, IANZ assessors focus solely on the site being assessed and are not available to respond immediately to telephone or email messages from outside callers. There are times when this inconveniences the caller, often a client who is endeavouring to resolve an issue. There is, unfortunately, little that can be done to ensure you are always able to reach the assessor within your timeframe but they do attempt to contact you at the earliest opportunity they get. This is not always the same day as some assessors often continue on into the evening completing the assessment process and managing the assessment team. Exasperating the situation is that the assessor, in many instances, is the only person who will have the information you require. But please, when calling, do explain your predicament to our telephone operator who will endeavour to find somebody who may be able to help you, usually a member the administration team who is familiar with the assessor’s work. |
||||||||||||||||||||
International recognition expands Reports from IANZ accredited laboratories and inspection bodies are now recognised by 63 accreditation bodies in 48 economies. In the past year, four accreditation bodies in four economies (Costa Rica, Thailand, Turkey, and USA) have become signatories to the Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs). New signatories are being added each year. Two new members of APLAC, Russia and Bangladesh, have yet to acquire signatory status, but Russia has applied. Also in 2006, the Regional Cooperation body for the Americas, Inter- American Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC), received formal ILAC recognition of the IAAC MRA in the fields of testing and calibration. Other Regional Co-operations such as the Southern African Development Community in Accreditation (SADCA) and the Central Asian Cooperation on Metrology Accreditation Standards and Quality (CAC-MAS-Q) continue to work toward ILAC MRA recognition. Global Mutual Recognition Arrangements for accredited inspection reports are gaining momentum with IANZ leading the way. IANZ now has signed arrangements recognising inspection body reports with Australia; People’s Republic of China; Hong Kong, China; Indonesia; Mexico; Singapore; Chinese Taipei; USA and Vietnam, and most member countries in the European Union. Another new element to MRAs is accreditation against ISO 15189 (for medical testing laboratories), with signatories to date being: IANZ, HKAS (Hong Kong), JAB (Japan), Standards Malaysia, TAF (Taiwan), DMSc (Thailand), SAC (Singapore) and ema (Mexico). Details of all international accreditation bodies and current MRA status can be found on www.ianz.govt.nz/international. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| People Sandra FitzPatrick Sandra, who took up her appointment in May 2007, has a Diploma in Medical Laboratory Science from the Auckland Institute of Technology, and the MAACB examination (chemical pathology). Chris Astbury Jane Busby |
||||||||||||||||||||
IANZ Publications NZFSA Laboratory Approval Scheme – AS LAB
10 Testing Laboratory Registration Council –
IA 2 A hardcopy of these and all other IANZ publications can be downloaded from www.ianz.govt.nz/publications or hard copies can be obtained free of charge by emailing: info@ianz.govt.nz or phoning (09) 525 6655. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Communication between Accrediting
Body and Testing Laboratory Understanding the Meaning of Accuracy,
Trueness and Precision Evaluation of analytical instrumentation.
Part XXII. Instrumentation for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
Training courses coming up Laboratory Quality Management OECD Good Laboratory Practice Internal Auditing Radiology Quality Management Inspection Body Accreditation Details of all courses and booking forms are available
from www.nzqc.co.nz , by phoning
0800 9000 99 or emailing info@nzqc.co.nz. |
||||||||||||||||||||
To
contact IANZ call 09 525 6655 or email info@ianz.govt.nz
|