|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First accredited Building Consent Authority
Palmerston North City Council celebrated being the first local authority to be accredited as a building consent authority with a function on 23 July at which Building and Construction Minister Clayton Cosgrove presented the council with an accreditation certificate. Mr Cosgrove congratulated the council, saying that its accreditation was a major milestone in building sector reforms aimed at ensuring that buildings are designed, built and inspected right the first time. “Councils are the consumer’s last line of defence for ensuring that our homes and other buildings have been built right,” Mr Cosgrove said. “The accreditation of building consent authorities will mean that councils will lift their game and deliver a better service to people needing building consents.” All councils are required to be accredited and registered as building consent authorities in order to continue to undertake building consent processing and inspection functions. The standards and criteria for accreditation are published by the Department of Building and Housing in the Building (Accreditation of Building Consent Authorities) Regulations 2006. IANZ chairman Robin Pratt told the ceremony that the council’s building controls department had been through a rigorous assessment process with experts in accreditation in building control systems, and in building design and construction. “Our assessment team critically assessed the council’s processes and procedures as well as the competency of its staff and facilities,” he said. “Inevitably, in first assessments such as this, some minor gaps in the council’s processes were identified, but the council addressed these issues with enthusiasm and efficiency. “Being the first to achieve accreditation is just reward for the tremendous amount of work they have put in.” Mr Cosgrove said Palmerston North City Council’s accreditation reflected its commitment to, and investment in, the task over the past two years. “The council has boosted its building controls staff numbers by eight, from 12 to 20, and has put these staff through training programmes so they are well equipped to meet the new, high quality inspections and processing standards,” he said. “The council has also upgraded its information technology, with field staff now using electronic tablets to input data into the database. These investments will directly benefit people who apply for building consents. “You have invested in your people and your systems, and the hard work has paid off.” However, Mr Cosgrove conceded that some councils were finding it a challenge to meet accreditation requirements. The Government has provided a $3 million accreditation assistance package to help them and has extended the timeframe by which councils need to achieve accreditation. Issued by the Department of Building and Housing, Wellington, 25 July 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Small rise in annual assessment numbers While revenue from accreditation services increased in 2006-2007 to $4,176,128 ($3,642,041 2005-2006), the service recorded a loss of $190,367 ($150,384 loss in 2005-2006). Dr Llewellyn Richards, IANZ Chief Executive, was disappointed with this result, but said it was largely due to the timing of new activities, in particular the later than expected implementation of the Building Consent Authorities accreditation programme. During the year, considerable time was spent helping the Department of Building and Housing complete and explain new legislative requirements for Building Consent Authorities accreditation. By year end, 61 applications had been received, almost all from local authorities, and one certificate issued. Dr Richards expects the financial results will be reversed in 2007-2008 with actual phasing of new accreditation activities. Accreditation
and conformity assessment sound IANZ is now involved in the initiative by the Ministry of Development to create a Regulatory Forum of policy and regulation makers, regulators, other government departments, and standards and conformance infrastructure bodies. Dr Llew Richards, IANZ Chief Executive, says this will only enhance our current efforts to improve the understanding of conformance assessment with these sectors of the economy. In another initiative from the review, Ian Roy, IANZ Manager International Affairs and Government Liaison, is actively involved with the Ministry in establishing a web-based information clearing house. This will greatly help Ian deal with the dozens of trade enquiries he receives each week from mainly importers seeking information about testing products and obtaining test reports from their suppliers. Staff
increased Full
report available |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| As signalled in last year’s annual report, the Testing Laboratory Registration Act 1972 was reprinted on 14 May 2007. Changes were made under Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publications Act 1989, which included both editorial changes to the format and style and the removal of sections now incorporated in the Crown Entities Act 2004. The functions of the Council were replaced with functions that are in line with present government requirements for standards and conformance. These include:
The
Council is required to act independently of Government in carrying out
its functions and exercising its statutory powers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Those organisations accredited by IANZ know only too well how rigorous IANZ assessments are and the benefits it brings to their operations. But many others are unaware that the type of accreditation IANZ provides is prevalent in New Zealand and throughout the world, and providing effective assurance of technical competence in important areas of the economy. To make it easier for regulators, business people and the general public to understand and appreciate the value that accreditation provides, a brochure has just been published explaining IANZ accreditation.
Information provided helps the reader appreciate the scope of accreditation
covering laboratories, inspection bodies and radiology services, and the
authority under which IANZ acts. The criteria for accreditation are described,
and examples of regulatory bodies that use IANZ accreditation to ensure
compliance with regulatory requirements are given.
A four-page briefing paper about IANZ accreditation for policy makers
has also been produced and may be obtained free of charge from IANZ. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Knowing how we can improve the way assessments are planned, arranged, conducted and reported is the reason behind client telephone surveys being undertaken by IANZ. Recommencing this year, a small proportion of clients are chosen at random and phoned inviting feedback. Calls are timed to take place three to six months after an IANZ assessment. The purpose of the survey is to discover whether IANZ meets the expectations of its clients. Already some improvements have been made as a result of the feedback received. An example is the need to improve access to forms by placing them on the website ready to download. This as now been done and may be found on www.ianz.govt.nz/publications2/forms.htm. Another
improvement suggested is that pre-assessment forms be partially completed
by IANZ with information we already know about the organisation so that
they will just need to be checked and any blanks filled in. This will
eliminate a rather tedious part of the assessment and save time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recognition in China of New Zealand accredited laboratories will be greatly improved when the first New Zealand/China Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement is signed. Under the agreement, most electrical and electronic goods may be tested and certified in New Zealand to go straight on to the market in China. The control process for goods coming into New Zealand from China will also be strengthened. IANZ Chief Executive, Dr Llew Richards, who has been a delegate at the discussions at the request of the Ministry of Economic Development, has provided technical advice on the recognition of testing such products in the regulated environment. IANZ and the China National Accreditation Services (CNAS) already have a mutual recognition arrangement in place where each party recognises test results from each others accredited laboratories. The level of recognition is now raised to a significantly new level with the formal obligation of both governments under this new Agreement. Future
negotiations are expected to include mutual recognition agreements for
agricultural equipment and machinery and a wide range of other products. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In the three months since May, the following organisations were accredited by IANZ. Laboratories
Building Consent Authorities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ILAC, the international cooperation of laboratory and inspection accreditation bodies, this year celebrates its 30th anniversary. One of the primary aims of ILAC is the removal of technical barriers to trade. Imagine you are importing toys from another country. The toys have been tested in that country by a laboratory which says it meets international safety standards. But how do you convince your authorities that the tests –and results – are genuine? That dilemma was a major impediment to international trade 30 years ago, but today, thanks to a handful of pioneers, things have changed for the better. The ability of authorities to trust technical standards and procedures from different countries reaches an important milestone this year - with ILAC celebrating 30 years of helping the world's economies overcome technical barriers to trade. ILAC’s evolution was prompted by the Tokyo round of international trade negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The outcome was the GATT Standards Code, an agreement between a number of the member states encouraging recognition of the equivalence of different standards, and the variety of testing and accreditation regimes. ILAC’s Chair, Daniel Pierre said: “The first conference on International Laboratory Accreditation was convened in Copenhagen in 1977 by Mr Per Lund Thoft of the Ministry of Trade, Denmark with the support of Dr Howard Forman of the US Department of Commerce. Twenty countries from around the world, the EEC Commission and ISO accepted their invitation.” The conference gave countries that already had or were planning accreditation schemes, an opportunity to compare notes and experiences. The delegations with practical experience were The National Testing Board of Denmark (1977), NVLAP US Department of Commerce (1976), BSI's System of the Registration of Test House, UK (1977) NATA - Australia (1947) and Telarc New Zealand (1973). “The outcome of that first ILAC conference was the idea that mutual recognition agreements between accreditation bodies meant any laboratory anywhere could have their test results recognised as reliable. ILAC from its inception has worked to create an international framework to support international trade through the removal of technical barriers. This is now recognised through the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). Fifty eight signatories, representing 46 economies have now signed the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement, enhancing the acceptance of products and services across national borders,” Mr Pierre said.
The ILAC Arrangement came into effect on 31 January 2001 to provide significant
technical underpinning to international trade. The key to the Arrangement
is the developing global network of accredited testing and calibration
laboratories that are assessed and recognised as being competent by ILAC
Arrangement signatory accreditation bodies. The signatories have, in turn,
been peer-reviewed and shown to meet the ILAC criteria for competence.
Now that the ILAC Arrangement is in place, governments can take advantage
of it to further develop or enhance trade agreements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This year, NATA, the Australian national accreditation authority, celebrates its sixtieth anniversary. Born of necessity in the Second World War, NATA led the world in establishing a laboratory approval scheme. During the war, Australia was cut off from any means of ensuring the munitions it was manufacturing were of the standard demanded by modern weapons. In late 1945, a conference on the coordination of testing services was attended by representatives of all State and Federal governments. The conference led to the formation of the National Association of Testing Authorities a little more than a year later. The new association was to provide a national testing service to Australia and would span across all technical, industrial and geographical areas of the country.
The notion of ensuring testing standards were themselves subject to examination
was then a novel one. Today, the pioneering work of NATA has led to the
Testing Laboratory Registration Council of New Zealand and similar organisations
being set up in all the world’s major economies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After 35 years continuous service, with the last seven years at the helm,
Tony Russell is retiring from NATA in November. His replacement as Chief
Executive is Alan Patterson, a business consultant with more than 30 years
experience in senior strategic and operational management roles. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New
Council member New
Staff at IANZ
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New
format
As
each publication is re-formatted, it will be made available on www.ianz.govt.nz/publications.
Where changes are made to the text, the publication will be reprinted
and distributed to the relevant clients as well as being posted on the
website. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Insider
Job Quality
Basics Evolution
of philosophy and description of measurement (preliminary rationale for
VIM3) How
does a laboratory monitor customer satisfaction?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Details
of all courses and booking forms are available from www.nzqc.co.nz,
by phoning 0800 9000 99 or emailing info@nzqc.co.nz. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To
contact IANZ call 09 525 6655 or email info@ianz.govt.nz
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||